Reflections on the Application of FinTech in ESG Risk Management under the Background of Sustainable Finance

Authors

  • Jieqiong Li Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C., 20001, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0jpb1j97

Keywords:

Sustainable finance, Financial technology(Fin Tech), ESG Risk Management, Green finance, Digital empowerment

Abstract

As China's green financial system continues to improve and sustainable finance steadily expands, it has effectively promoted the green and low-carbon transformation and upgrading of the domestic capital market. Against the backdrop of the routine development of green investment and financing activities, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risk management has become a core tool for financial institutions to ensure compliance and control green credit risks, directly determining the quality of risk management across various green financial services. Traditional ESG assessment systems primarily rely on static corporate disclosures and manual expertise for risk evaluation, resulting in a relatively coarse overall approach that struggles to adapt to the new industry landscape following the full implementation of low-carbon policies. These systems commonly suffer from inherent shortcomings such as delayed data updates, strong subjectivity in human judgment, reactive risk mitigation, and insufficient coverage of risk dimensions, making them inadequate to meet today’s demand for refined, high-quality green finance development. Leveraging cutting-edge fintech technologies—including big data, blockchain, and artificial intelligence—financial institutions can achieve quantitative risk assessment, dynamic monitoring, and end-to-end closed-loop management of ESG risks, significantly enhancing the intelligence and precision of green risk governance. However, in practice, multiple real-world barriers still hinder the effective application of fintech in ESG risk management. Issues such as significant disparities in data quality, structural biases in algorithms, lack of standardization in industry-wide ESG evaluation frameworks, and lagging regulatory evolution substantially diminish the enabling power of digital technologies. Based on current industry practices, this paper systematically identifies key application scenarios of fintech in ESG risk management, deeply analyzes critical implementation bottlenecks, and proposes targeted optimization pathways to provide practical guidance for Chinese financial institutions in building standardized, digitalized ESG risk control systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Diaz-Rainey, I., Robertson, B., & Wilson, C. (2021). Challenges for ESG data and climate risk analytics in financial institutions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(3), 311–332.

[2] Bae, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Blockchain technology for sustainable finance: ESG data integrity and risk mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133789.

[3] Agrawal, A., & Dutt, R. (2023). Machine learning for climate-related financial risk assessment: Limits and biases in ESG scoring. Journal of Risk Finance, 24(4), 412–428.

[4] Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2020). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716.

[5] Hofmann, E., & Busch, T. (2021). Digitalization and ESG risk management in supply chain finance. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(2), 379–396.

[6] Kölbel, J. F., Heeb, F., Paetzold, F., & Busch, T. (2020). Can sustainable investing save the world? Critical review of the literature. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 554–574.

[7] Lin, M., & Yang, Y. (2023). Big data-enabled ESG risk screening and the reduction of information asymmetry in green bond markets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 245–267.

[8] Moratis, L., & Brandt, S. (2022). The dark side of fintech in sustainability finance: Algorithmic bias and ESG misclassification risk. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 1894–1910.

[9] Nguyen, T. T., & Pham, H. T. (2024). FinTech adoption, ESG disclosure quality and credit risk: International bank-level evidence. Journal of Banking Regulation, 25, 287–304.

[10] Rezaee, Z., & Wang, H. (2019). Blockchain and ESG reporting: Opportunities, risks, and governance implications. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 11(2), 1–26.

[11] Sarker, M., & Bashar, A. (2024). Green fintech and climate risk management: Evidence from cross-country banking data. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(3), 4521–4538.

[12] Scherer, T., & Möslein, K. (2023). Automated ESG analytics: How machine learning mitigates and creates new risks for institutional investors. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113845.

[13] Zhang, H., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2024). FinTech, ESG rating divergence and corporate transition risk. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 85, 102564.

[14] Flammer, C., & Toffel, M. W. (2021). Managing the risks of ESG data. Harvard Business Review, 99(3), 74–82.

[15] Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence and ESG risk measurement: Data gaps and methodological limitations. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 1412–1431.

[16] Ozili, P. K. (2022). Green fintech, sustainable finance and climate risk: A review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(11), 511.

[17] Ameli, N., & Kaur, A. (2023). Algorithmic ESG investing: Bias, opacity and regulatory challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(3), 521–540.

Downloads

Published

06-11-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, J. (2026). Reflections on the Application of FinTech in ESG Risk Management under the Background of Sustainable Finance. Journal of Mathematical Finance and Risk Management, 2(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.54097/0jpb1j97